![]() I’ve never used either one, so I can’t judge them on their relative merits, but reviewers and user comments seem to indicate that FCP is the superior product. You state that Apple “will burn both customers and developers to make ‘progress’ “, but this doesn’t appear so clear cut to me in the case of FCP vs. You raise an interesting point, and one to which I wish I knew the answer. Adobe’s Premiere was not a quality application on the Mac… and Adobe payed dearly because of it. Thats all.”Ī company needs to make quality product for it to show profit. “Is not a statement as to Apple or Wintel being better, the issue is profitability for Adobe and others. They need to make software worth paying for first before they’ll get Mac users money. “Nothing personal, a company needs to make money and move on to markets that are fertile while abandoning unfertile ground.” Apple saw Adobe’s failings on the Mac market, and decided to pick up the slack. Mac users didn t buy Premiere because Adobe wasn’t makeing a quality application, nor were they taking advantage of Apple technologies that would have really made their software fly (i.e. “Er, you just prove my point: if Mac users don’t buy Adobe products or not enough of them, Adobe still needs to make $money$ so they will drop support for the Mac App and continue to get revenue out of the Wintel pastures.”Īdobe has to make applications that are worthy of Mac users money. ![]() “I hope Apple get their act together and offer a better enviroment for 3rd party Software like Adobe and others.” “Apple will burn both costumers and developers to make “progress?””Īpple has made some unpopular business decisions, but that does not mean that they’re out to burn consumers or developers. Any new ones that pop up are no different than those that come up for any fortune 500 company. “but unfortunetaly this has not hapened,”Īpple cleaned up its problems a long time ago. Oh please… Apple’s “act” is very much together. “Still I believe Adobe has hoped for a long time that Apple will get their act together” Adobe is just as commited to the Mac as before… *very comitted* ![]() The reason Adobe pulled Premiere is not because they’re less comited to the Mac, but because Final Cut took all their market share away. The Mac’s install base is MORE than healthy enough for a company like adobe.Īdobe is not committed to Apple as they used to be, as the withdraw of a recent movie making software proves.” For Appleications like Photoshop, Illustrator etc… the difference is negligable. Don’t think that because Windows has a larger installed base that software sales in the markets Adobe competes in are the same. Like any other company Adobe is out to make $money$ and unfortunetely the grass is greener on the Wintel side.” “Agree, however I would not go as far as saying “deeply committed”.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |